<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Комментарии на: ИЕРАРХИЯ у крыс</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pagadaga.net/2013/01/30/rats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pagadaga.net/2013/01/30/rats/</link>
	<description>MOOD is GOOD!! - письма Мавледжану и другие опыты в сети</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>От: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://pagadaga.net/2013/01/30/rats/#comment-49989</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 01:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagadaga.net/?p=2414#comment-49989</guid>
		<description>&#8220;So much for separation of Church and Sta2&#38;.&#8221;Obamae#8t17;s remarks don&#8217;t threaten the establishment clause, or the free exercise clause, so it would seem that they have little to do with the formal doctrine of separation of church and state, at least in the American tradition. Separation of church and state, as it is understood in the United States, does not preclude strong statements of belief by candidates, or even support for certain laws on religious grounds. It would be better just to denounce the absurd ramblings of Jesus-cultists head-on, rather than rely on the invocation of a politco-legal principle that is only very vaguely relevant.BBB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So much for separation of Church and Sta2&amp;.&#8221;Obamae#8t17;s remarks don&#8217;t threaten the establishment clause, or the free exercise clause, so it would seem that they have little to do with the formal doctrine of separation of church and state, at least in the American tradition. Separation of church and state, as it is understood in the United States, does not preclude strong statements of belief by candidates, or even support for certain laws on religious grounds. It would be better just to denounce the absurd ramblings of Jesus-cultists head-on, rather than rely on the invocation of a politco-legal principle that is only very vaguely relevant.BBB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
